Estimating a reasonable size for a tiny speck of gold that basically looks cube-shaped can be described as trying to guess the cube's width. A problem arises when having that guessed dimension raised to a power of three when trying to calculate the cube's volume. Another problem arises when the actual shape is nothing like a cube. The resulting volume may be off considerably due to size estimation errors. For this reason, **use more than one estimate for bracketing in a likely value for the size of the gold in question. Use a size estimate that is likely smaller than the gold in question and then use one that is likely the correct size. Know that your resulting price estimate will only be as good as the estimate of the object's actual volume. (Please, see the example below).**

- This software is for education purposes only and should not stand in lieu of a scale.
- Calculator estimates are based upon idealized impurity types.
- Values generated may differ from actual values due to additional impurities, and/or size estimation errors.
- User accepts full responsibility for information provided by this calculator.
- I make every effort to ensure that all content is accurate at the time of publication, but am unable to provide a guarantee or warranty of any kind as to the accuracy or the completeness of the content provided.
- I would like you to read the following disclaimer provided in plain language. For the purposes of this disclaimer, the term "I" pertains to me, the owner of QuickGoldTally and anyone affiliated with it.
- QuickGoldTally is an independent website free from any gold prospector's control.
- All content contained on this website is for informational purposes only.
- I am not a gold prospector and don't directly offer or provide real prospecting services of any kind.
- On this website, I include information and statements that should be considered as opinion rather than fact.
- This website may contain content submitted by users that does not reflect my opinions or views in any way.
- On this website, we may include links to external websites over which we have no control.
- Any recommendations made on this website are based on opinion and should not be considered as formal endorsements.
- Any advice provided on this website should not be considered as legal or professional advice in any way.
- It's the responsibility of users to ensure that any prospecting activities they undertake are legal in their area, state, country or jurisdiction, before undertaking such activities.
- It's the responsibility of users to ensure that they meet all age and other regulatory requirements prior to registering an account at any prospecting site we list or reference in any way.
- I cannot be held responsible or liable in any way for losses or damages of any kind incurred as a result of using this website, or as a result of using any website linked from this website.
- I reserve the right to edit, remove, or add to any content provided on this website at any time, without prior notice.
- I reserve the right to amend the Terms of Use at any time, without prior notice.

Above, there was discussion of an error created when not knowing the actual dimensions involved. To better illustrate this issue, let’s briefly examine the 1/10th Troy Ounce coin: The coin has a stated diameter of 16.5 mm, a thickness at its edge of 1.19 mm and a mass of 3.393 grams. It has a mix of copper and silver as the impurities with a ratio of 16 to 9, set at 22 karat.

By using the formula for finding the volume of a cylinder, we can produce a reasonable estimate for a volume: radius squared, multiplied by pi, then multiplied by the edge thickness.

Using the basic raw dimensions of the coin to develop a volume mathematically, we generate a volume of 254.45 cubic millimeters. Loading 254.45 cu mm into the QuckGoldTally volume input field (Cube Size, far right), while remembering to also load in the 22 karat and switch the impurity to 16:9(Cu,Ag), we get an expected mass of 4.515 grams. Yet, the stated value for the mass of the coin, given above, is 3.393 grams. How can this be? This difference is due to the fact that the dimensions for the coin are based upon a perfect cylindrical shape. But, an actual coin has pits and indents, making its shape smaller – even though the differences in size seem trivial.

Here we see the perfect cylindrical shape of the idealized coin:

And, here is a view of the actual coin itself, sharing the same outside measurements as the idealized coin, but also having relief detail:

Notice the small differences in thickness along the above coin's face. Though these differences seem trivial, they can produce a significant amount of error when trying to calculate volume. In other words, we don't so much need the general thickness of the coin, measured by a set of calipers, but, rather, the true "average" thickness, taking into account the relief involved.

This next set of images show the actual volume of the coin itself as a cube (below left), the cubic volume of the removed relief detail (below middle) and the idealized cubic volume of the coin, (again, shown as a cube, calculated from coin’s raw, outside dimensions obtained with a set of calipers, seen below right):

Above, notice how similar the cube on the far left appears with regard to the cube on the far right. Yet, they both differ by the amount equal to the size of the cube in the middle. This goes to show the sort of error involved if relying entirely upon an estimated size in order to glean the likely weight of the object in question. For this reason, use more than one estimate to bracket in a more likely value.

QuickGoldTally |
instructions |
disclaimer |
technical dissertation |
volume |
mesh |
acceleration |
mass |
weight |
density |
percent |
karat |
value |
comments